The Archives

Browse the content below to find what you're looking for.

Dividends from IVV and VOO

Friday, June 24th, 2011

See this post for updated dividend information for IVV and VOO.

Whopper splits coming up for VelocityShares’ XIV and ZIV

Tuesday, June 21st, 2011

Evidently the folks at VelocityShares decided that the shares of their inverse volatility offerings were way too pricey, because they are splitting their short term fund, XIV ten to one, and their medium term fund, ZIV by eight to one.  Based on today’s closing prices of 167 for XIV and 132 for ZIV, they will both end up priced at around $16.50 after end of trading this Friday, June 24th, when the splits become effective.

This move strikes me as a strategy shift to broaden the appeal of the funds.  They were introduced last November at around $100/share—not exactly cheap.

As long as an equity stays above $10/share I don’t much care what the price is.  I’m looking for percentage moves.  I question whether splits like this make much difference in the market.  It will be interesting to monitor the volumes, spreads, etc., to see what the effects are.

For more information about these splits, see this news release.

.

A big bet on XIV

Thursday, June 16th, 2011

It looks like someone big thinks the market is going to have a upswing today—buying 100,000 shares of  XIV in pre-market at 159.85 ($15.985 million).  It could have been a sale, but I doubt it.

The exchanges show XIV trading  over a million shares before market open today, but I’m assuming that’s an error because the only big trade that shows up is the 100,000 share block.    If the volume number is correct it would be XIV’s first day with over a million shares traded. Reaching the 1 million share mark for the first time in pre-market would probably be unprecedented in the relatively short history of ETF/ETN type equities.

In other volatility related events,  the June VIX options expired yesterday, with a settlement price (VRO) of 19.73 and the VIX index opening at 19.31.   July VIX options won’t expire until July 20th—it is one of those times when they expire later in the month than the equity options.   For tickers on VRO, VIX, and other  related volatility related products see volatility tickers.

.

IVOP and XIV termination events

Sunday, June 5th, 2011

In the prospectuses for IVOP and XIV, there are some disconcerting discussions about termination events. In the case of IVOP, it occurs if its value drops below $10 and for XIV it is triggered if the daily percentage drop exceeds 80%. I did some digging into these events to try and figure out how likely they are to occur.  If you’d like to read a more general discussion about these two ETNs you can read this post.

First of all the IVOP and XIV provisions for termination/acceleration relate to volatility futures not the CBOE’s VIX index. The VIX relates to the instantaneous implied volatility of the S&P 500—which is a different thing. Volatility futures have contracts with different expiration dates. Typically the further out their expiration dates (e.g., 6 months from now), the slower they react to the day-to-day moves of the market. IVO and XIV are based on the two futures contracts that are closest to expiration, the administrators for these funds adjust their positions in these contracts daily to achieve an effective average time till expiration of 30 days.

VXX does the same thing, except it is trying to be long volatility, not short/daily inverse % of volatility. When trying to understand IVOP or XIV you can view them as being a short position in VXX (IVOP), or tracking the opposite daily percentage move of VXX (XIV).

VXX is not as volatile as the VIX index. On a day with sharp market moves VXX will typically move about half the percentage move of what VIX does. VXX can still make big moves however—one day during the May 2010 Flash Crash, it jumped almost 25%—the VIX on that day jumped 46%.

Now we can talk about termination / acceleration. I think it is reasonable to assume that the goals of the ETN providers in including these measures are to:

  • Prevent the ETN value from going negative (they specify in these prospectuses that the value will stay positive)
  • Protect the provider from undue market risk in hedging these products during volatile times

IVOP is essentially a short position in VXX, and Barclays doesn’t want to ever lose more than was put into it, so they liquidate the fund if it drops below $10 on the market. This termination would occur if VXX climbs 50% above its value when IVOP was created—jumping from $41.55 to approximately $63.

With XIV termination (or “acceleration” in marketing speak) relates to daily percentage moves. If VXX jumped more than 100% in a day, then if VelocityShares didn’t terminate XIV its notational value could go to zero.   They avoid this particular unhappy situation by terminating the fund if the daily move of VXX is 80% or more—although losing 80% in one day would still be plenty traumatic.

Just to be clear, these funds aren’t tied directly to VXX, but rather the underlying futures contracts, but I believe VXX is a good proxy for the situation.

The termination risk for XIV appears to be limited to market crashes worse than the Flash crash. Two examples that come to mind are the 2009 crash and the October 1987 crash. VXX didn’t exist for either of these. I have analyzed VIX data (or simulated data) since 1992—there were 20 days with VIX jumping over 30% (previous day close to intraday high) during that period. The highest percentage jump over that period was 70.5% on February 27, 2007. There were three days with VIX jumps over 30% in the 2008/2009 crash, and during the Flash Crash.

If VXX had existed during this time span, and held to its typical behavior of 50% of VIX’s move it looks like the XIV termination event would not have occurred, but obviously it would have taken heavy losses on those days.

The termination risks for IVOP (and its fallen sibling IVO) are obviously higher.   All it takes is an absolute 50% rise in the SPXVSTR index from its value at IVOP’s inception to kill the fund.

In IVO and IVOP’s case it matters when the fund was initiated, because VXX going up 50% over the case of a correction/crash is common.  IVO started January 20th, 2011, when the VIX index was a relatively low 18.   The VIX index at IVOP’s inception was at 31,  so the timing seems to be better—assuming we don’t go into a 2009 style crash in the next 6 months or so.

If you are investing significant amounts of money in these products it looks prudent to at least hold some OTM VIX or VXX  calls. These would provide some insurance against these infrequent, but dramatic events.

Thanks to Steve, who commented on the first version of this post pointing out that the ETN providers were probably not looking out for the investor, but rather for their own hides in incorporating these termination events.

.

Inverse volatility—the winner is XIV

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011

I used to share stock tips with my brother-in-laws. Before the tech crash I could offer up a few stocks I liked, and they would often make some money.  The crash painfully ended the easy money and I moved onto index funds. They didn’t think indexes were near as much fun.

This Easter one of my brother-in-laws asked what I was investing in.   My response was “inverse volatility.” I might as well have said pixie dust.  I stood there wondering where (or if) to start.   First you have stocks, then you have the S&P 500, then you options on the S&P 500, then you have implied volatility calculations, then you have futures on volatility, then you have ETNs with rolling mixtures of futures on volatilty (VXX), and then you have the inverse (or the short) of that.   We looked each other in the eye and wordlessly agreed that we wouldn’t start.

I like inverse VXX/VXZ investing.  It’s seldom boring and over the long run the advantage is on your side. Volatility has a return to mean behavior, and volatility futures are almost always in contango—which erodes the value of VXX. If you buy inverse volatility when the VIX is relatively high, your chances of making a good profit eventually are very good.

Currently there are ten choices in inverse volatility ETN/ETFs.  Barclays offers the XXV and IVOP ETNs which emulate short positions in VXX, VelocityShares offers XIV (daily percentage inverse of VXX), and ZIV (daily percentage inverse of medium term VXZ), and UBS offers a family of 6 funds, very similar to XIV and ZIV except they cover 1 month to 6 month terms in one month intervals.  I have not evaluated UBS’s funds, but I expect they will be equivalent to VelocityShare’s offerings except for currently being less liquid, with wider spreads.

In rating the Barclay and VelocityShare funds I think there are  three primary factors:

  • Liquidity (small bid-asked spreads, getting good fills on orders)
  • Leverage
  • Risk

ZIV’s daily volume is typically around 10K shares so its not great from a liquidity standpoint—I’m down to three choices.

On leverage  XIV is simple, its goal is negative one-to-one for VXX’s daily percentage moves. The leverage of XXV and IVOP is not so simple.

It turns out that the daily percentage leverage of a short position is a variable which changes as the equity changes in price. For example, if you short XYZ stock at $100, the first $1 move either way delivers 1X leverage—you gain or lose $1,which is +-1/100 = +- 1% . But the further you get from that initiating price, the more the daily leverage changes.

For example, imagine after you sell XYZ short at $100 it drops like a rock to $2/share. If it drops the next day from $2 to $1.5, it’s a 25% daily move—but the value of your short position only changes from $98  to $98.5 per share. That’s a 0.5% move and the leverage, 0.5%/25% is only  0.02X. Conversely, if XYZ moves to $150 after you short it at $100, a $1 daily move down (0.67%) changes your position value from $50/share to $51/share—a 2% move which is  2%/.67% = 3X leverage. The graph below shows this relationship.

.

XXV, IVOP, XIV leverage vs VXX, click to enlarge

The drop off to zero leverage on IVO and IVOP  is Barclays’  ”Automatic Termination Event” that stops out their inverse funds if they drop  below $10 per share. This prevents these funds from going negative. This termination is a real risk for the Barclay products, IVO was terminated in September 2011 when VXX went above $49.5 per share.  IVOP will terminate if VXX goes above approximately 63.

Barclays ETNs only have 1X leverage when VXX is at their inception price, which is 41.55 for IVOP and 108.03 (split adjusted) for XXV. I think this is a terrible aspect of Barclays’ funds.  When things are going in your favor (volatility dropping) your leverage is dropping, and it climbs rapidly when volatility is spiking—the opposite of what you would like.  This loss of leverage as VXX declines forced Barclays to introduce IVO, because XXV leverage had dropped so low.  In the future as contango grinds away at the VXX value Barclays will need to introduce a follow-on to IVOP to get their leverage back up near the 1X range. XIV is a clear winner on leverage.

Regarding risk, these are volatile products. They will get hammered when volatility spikes up. In the August/September 2011 correction XIV dropped from 19 to 6.5, a 66% drop in a few weeks. If the market goes into a major bear mode it might take a long time to recover your losses. Recent history has shown that daily percentage funds like XIV weather volatility spikes better than true shorts like IVOP, or the departed IVO.  XIV is a clear winner on termination risk—it is much less likely to automatically stop out investors.  See this post for more information on termination.

Although all inverse volatility funds benefit from the normal contango term structure of volatility futures,  they aren’t reasonable buy and hold choices for investors.  Investors should hedge, or go to the sidelines if the market looks “toppy”.   All your gains can evaporate in a big hurry if the market corrects or crashes.

Will Barclays respond to XIV’s growing success by introducing a 1X leverage fund? I doubt it. They have a great situation with XXV and IVOP—every dollar invested in these funds is a perfect hedge against their other short term volatility product: VXX.   They can skip the hedging expenses on both sides because they hedge each other, and Barclay can collect their %0.89 annual fee, risk free.

.

Mostly quiet on the volatility front

Wednesday, May 11th, 2011

There haven’t been any new volatility ETNs or ETFs introduced for almost 4 months now, so it is about time for another wave.  In April options were introduced on VelocityShares VIIX  (a VXX wannabe), but it’s hard to see how these can compete effectively with VXX’s options.

The funds that are attracting the most interest (and likely additional competitors) are VelocityShares’ 2X short term TVIX and their inverse volatility fund XIV.   The daily volumes on these two have been exceeding 1 million and 200K respectively, while the rest of the newer funds are lucky to get 10k shares per day.   ProShares VIXY (VXX wannabe) is the exception to that, with growing volume that is getting into the 300K per day range.   It is a mystery to me why it’s gaining popularity—perhaps because it is an ETF, not an ETN.

TVIX has a big lead over CVOL, which offers a similar 2X strategy and XIV is gaining ground over Barclay’s XXV and IVO inverse funds.   XIV’s leadership is not surprising— it’s a much better choice than XXV & IVO’s short VXX  approach.  I’ll write more on this in a couple of days.

For a summary of all the available volatility ETNs and ETFs see Volatility Tickers.

.

XVIX: raise, hold, or fold?

Saturday, April 30th, 2011

I bought a fair amount of XVIX in January—it has not been good bet so far.  Recently it has been trading near the $25.41  price that I paid, so I’m taking a look at what I should do on the next round.

UBS’ E-TRACS XVIX ETN is designed to take advantage of the volatility futures contango that torments Barclays’ popular VXX ETN.    VXX provides a way to go long on volatility—which in theory provides a good hedge against sudden market drops.  However, since VXX is based on the performance of the two nearest term volatility futures it underperforms relative to the VIX index, and suffers ongoing price erosion as its futures have to be rolled over to longer term futures (this is done incrementally on a daily basis).

XVIX attempts to capitalize on this erosion by taking the opposite position that VXX does, being short these futures, and then hedging against big spikes in volatility by buying longer term volatility futures—the same set that Barclays’ VXZ uses. It has only been around since December 2010, but historically XVIX’s strategy has averaged a 24% annual gain over the last 5 years.  For more information on the historical performance of this strategy see this article in Volatility Futures and Options.

This year, after 4 months XVIX is down 2.3%, and it has been down as much as 9.5%  for the year.  Is this just a momentary setback, or are XVIX’s underlying assumptions no longer valid?

Bloomberg provides charts with up to 5 years of historical data on the indexes that these ETNs are based on.  The Bloomberg chart below shows how the indexes for XVIX, VXX (long short term volatility), and VXZ (medium term volatility) have behaved over the last five years.

Index performance: XVIX(orange), VXX (green), VXZ (reddish organge), click to enlarge

The chart tells the story for VXIV’s lack of performance.  The short term future index (green line) continues to erode due to contango, but the medium term index (reddish orange line ) has been dropping at a unprecedented rate ( for a bull market)  since around August of  2010.   XVIX won’t be going up much until this drop-off stops.  The medium term index won’t drop to zero, because volatility is mean-reverting, but if it’s going to drop to 2007 levels it still has a ways to go.  It is also interesting to look at the medium term index vs the VIX cash index.

Medium term futures index vs VIX

I think it is reasonable that the medium term index will level out around the pre-financial crash 2008 levels—where it is now.  With increasing asset correlation and a fairly nervous market I don’t expect medium term volatility futures to drop much more.  For the time being, I’m going to hold my position.  When the medium term futures level out, I will probably increase my bet.

.

Adding back in some XIV

Tuesday, April 12th, 2011

Bought some XIV this morning at 140.05.

Interesting, at 11:15 ET  VIX is up almost 11%, but the volatility futures are not playing along.   VXX is only up 2.3%  —normally I would expect more like 50% of the VIX move on a mid-week day with no weekend effect to confuse things.   So far the volatility futures traders are not betting on a big dip.

Lightening up on XIV

Tuesday, April 5th, 2011

VelocityShares’ XIV inverse volatility ETN has risen 37% from a low of 105.48 on March 16th to close at 144.47 today, April 5th. Today, with the VIX starting to flirt with pre-Japan Earthquake lows I decided to lighten up the position in XIV that I had built up during the correction, reducing it by 40%. For more information on XIV see this post.

2 Months of VIX, click to enlarge

The gains from XIV have probably switched from “fast mode”, driven by the rapid drop in volatility as the market recovers from the correction, into “slow mode”—driven by the ongoing contango that VXX suffers and XIV benefits from. It is tempting to keep the whole XIV position on the table to benefit from this tail wind, but the risk of volatility spiking up seems to be pretty high.  The market is looking a little toppy.

Sailing through the IEF ex-dividend

Saturday, April 2nd, 2011

IEF, Barclays 7-10 year Treasury note ETF, went ex-dividend April 1st with a declared dividend of $0.248 per share.  Somewhat surprisingly my IEF + DTYS hedge didn’t dip at all, closing at 146.11, the same close as the 31st.  I don’t see any reason why DTYS should go up on IEF’s ex-dividend date—and it is probably just a random thing. I’m not complaining.  During the day the hedge went as high as 146.24.    The average price of the IEF+DTYS hedge since DTYS started trading in August 2010 is 146.17.

.