A Tale of Two Bulls

Friday, May 17th, 2013 | Vance Harwood
 
SPY-13vs07a

 

The prices of SPY (S&P 500) starting in March of 2003 and of 2009 have tracked each other surprisingly well over a 6 year period.   The current market has managed higher highs each year, but then that advantage has evaporated by the Christmas holidays.

This year the market has already achieved the higher highs part of the pattern—and for the first time since this recovery begain the VIX levels between the two bull markets have become comparable.   If 2013 follows the 2007 pattern we will see a significant up-tick in volatility later this year—with the VIX reaching at least the low 30s.   In 2007 the market went into its sideways pattern around May 18th.

 


Prediction: Dec 31,2013 S&P 500 close at 1468.38 up 2.96%

Saturday, February 23rd, 2013 | Vance Harwood
 

My forecasting technique has correctly predicted the S&P 500′s year-end close with an average accuracy of 1.6% for the last 5 years:

Year End Estimated  Actual % Difference
31-Dec-08 879.82 903.25  +2.66%
31-Dec-09 1111.92 1115.1  +0.286%
30-Dec-10 1211.92 1257.88  +3.79%
30-Dec-11 1248.29 1257.60  +0.75%
31-Dec-12 1418.30 1426.19  +0.56%
31-Dec-13 1468.38    ??     ??



This forecast doesn’t require much computation—it’s the year-end closing value of the S&P 500 six years prior.   The chart below shows SPY (effectively 1/10 of the S&P 500) from 2003 to 2007 with SPY from 2009 to the present superposed on the same day of the month.

SPY07-13



At the bottom I’ve shown the VIX index for these two different time spans.

I don’t believe charts from the past are reliable in predicting the future, but since seeing this pattern in November, 2009 I’ve been surprised at its close correlation (0.94!)   This year’s divergence was less than 2011′s, with 2012′s SPY going as much as 11% above the 2006 levels and only 3% below.

Correlation does not necessarily imply causation.   Nobody believes that today’s  market is consulting the 2007 stock records to determine its movements, but on the other hand this pattern does not feel like a random happenstance.  I think the similarity comes from both periods being  recovery phases after major crashes.   The big question is how long will this tracking persist.

If this pattern holds the S&P 500 will end 2013 with a paltry 3% gain—likely with a lot of volatility between now and then.   Some of the factors that will be influencing the market this year:

Economy

  • In 2007 we were getting into the frothy part of the housing boom/bubble.  Qualified buyers were getting scare and prices were sky high.  In 2013 housing seems poised for normalcy, with the foreclosure backlog reduced to manageable levels and new starts climbing.   New housing is a great creator of jobs and associated demand for materials, appliances, furniture, etc.
  • Short term Treasury bills in January 2007 were yielding 4.93%—65 times the January 2013 rate of  0.075%.   Even with that level of economic support from the Fed, this economy is struggling to create jobs.  The economy will need to improve quite a bit before the Feb starts applying the monetary brakes—and interest rates start their inevitable climb.
  • Given 2007′s high interest rates I expected its inflation rate would have been high, but actually inflation was easing in 2007, averaging 2.85%—not much higher than 2012′s 2.07% rate.
  • In general unemployment remains high, and wage increases have been very small.   It’s possible that structural shifts in the economy have permanently reduced the need for medium to low skill jobs—which would be bad news for demand.
  • Europe has been relatively quiet.  Clearly the European Union has decided to pay what ever it takes to keep Greece in the union, and this has reduced the overall fear factor.   A destabilizing factor is the very high unemployment rates in the weaker countries.

Market valuation and money flows

  • The Shiller inflation adjusted PE ratio for the S&P 500  is currently 21.6, which compares to 27.20 in January 2007—20% lower.    However, historically this PE ratio has averaged 18.5, so you can argue we’re already near the top.
  • There’s a lot of money parked in bonds and cash.  If it flows into equities we’ll see a run-up—but it feels like these investors are arriving very late in the recovery.   Has the “buy high, sell low” crowd just arrived at the party?

Psychological Barriers 

  • The 1550 level on the S&P 500 index presents a daunting 13 year old resistance level.  No one wants to be the poor sucker that buys at the top.

S&P 500 Resistance

S&P 500 Resistance

 

One thing is clear, regardless of how 2013 goes, we don’t want a repeat of 2008 in 2014.

SPY 2003 -- 2008

SPY 2003 — 2008

 


Prediction: Dec 31,2012 S&P 500 close at 1418, up 12.78%

Thursday, January 17th, 2013 | Vance Harwood
 

Originally posted 10-Jan-2012

One forecaster has correctly predicted the S&P 500 year-end close within an average of 2% for the last 4 years:

Year End Estimated  Actual % Difference
31-Dec-08 879.82 903.25  +2.66%
31-Dec-09 1111.92 1115.1  +0.286%
30-Dec-10 1211.92 1257.88  +3.79%
30-Dec-11 1248.29 1257.60  +0.75%
31-Dec-12 1418.30    ??

 

This forecast is not from a  human, or a computer program—it’s the year-end closing value of the S&P from 6 years prior.   The chart below shows SPY (effectively 1/10 of the S&P) from 2003 to 2006 with SPY from 2009 to the present superposed on the same day of the month.

At the bottom I’ve shown the VIX index for these two different time spans.

I don’t believe patterns from the past are reliable in predicting the future.   It’s not surprising that markets recovering from crashes will show a similar trajectory, but since first seeing this pattern in November, 2009 I’ve been surprised at the close correlation.   This year showed the biggest divergence, with 2011 SPY going as much as 19% above the 2005 SPY and 10% below before moving back into synchronization.

One thing is clear—volatility since the 2008/2009 crash continues to be elevated.   I predict that the market in 2012 will not be for the faint of heart.


What about 2011—will it be a replay of 2005?

Wednesday, December 15th, 2010 | Vance Harwood
 

Since November 2009 I have been noting that the S&P500 (represented here by SPY) has been closely retracing the path that it followed in 2003 and 2004.  Now that 2010 is drawing to a close, I took a look back at 2005 to get one vision (hallucination?) of what lies ahead for 2011.  My updated graph showing SPY, normalized SPY volume and VIX over those 3 years is shown below:

SPY 2003 through 2005 vs. SPY 2009 through 2010, click to enlarge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A couple things jumped out to me, looking at the 2005 results:

  1. 2005 was a sideways year, with very little movement. The low for the year was around 114, the high 128—boring.
  2. Volume really picked up later in the year.  Did the retail investors, burned by the tech crash finally come back to the market?
  3. Volatility in 2005, as measured by the VIX was quite low.  People are remarking about our recent lows of 17, but 2005 averaged 12.8.

.

Although the 2009—2010 price path has crossed over the 2003-2004 path at least every couple of months, the 2009-2010 volatility has been consistently much higher than the numbers 6 years ago.  Is this due to lingering fear from the truly scary days of 2009, or has something structurally changed in the market?  There is no question that the inherent speed of the market has multiplied (Nanex reports that the Flash Crash propagated from Chicago Futures to the New York exchanges  in 20 milliseconds).   For reference light takes about 4 milliseconds to cover that distance.  I’m pretty sure the market linkages were at least a factor of 10 slower in 2004.   Whether this directly leads to increased volatility is open for debate, but I don’t see how it could inherently reduce volatility.    I’m pretty confident that 2011′s volatility will on average stay higher than 2005′s results.

I don’t believe that price pattern coincidences are necessarily predictive.    I think there are macro-economic similarities between the two periods, but there are also a lot of differences (e.g., increasing correlation between asset classes, on-going intervention by the Fed, very low inflation, etc.).    My gut feel is that 2011 will be better than 2006, but my crystal ball is not particularly reliable…

.


The tale of two rallies

Monday, October 11th, 2010 | Vance Harwood
 

SPY’s 2010 price path for the 8th of October is about 3 points higher that the 2004 trend top line, but that is consistent with 2010′s considerably higher volatility. Recently there have been articles noting relatively low trading volumes, but compared to the normalized volume in 2004 (which at an absolute level was about 3.5x lower) volumes don’t look out of line.

SPY 2004 vs 2010, click to enlarge

The rally that we are currently in started around the 31st of August.    To me it has felt similar to the long rally we had starting in February 2010.   No wonder.  Both rallies started with SPY in the 105 to 106 range, and have tracked closely since then on a day by day basis–see below.

SPY rallies: Feb 2010 vs Aug 2010, click to enlarge.

If these rallies stay in sync then we would expect the next bear cycle to start right before Thanksgiving.

.